phoenix64: parker holding an orange and smiling (slippery slope)
phoenix64 ([personal profile] phoenix64) wrote2008-07-30 07:03 pm
Entry tags:

No, seriously

What is it that separates perfectly respectable historical fiction from squick-inducing Real People Fic/Slash?

It can't be the sex, because there is plenty of respectable or at least semi-respectable historical fiction that doesn't shy away from sex.

Is it that the protagonists are still living, or close members of their families might still be living? Because I've seen people still have that squick reaction when that isn't necessarily the case.

Is it an acknowledgment of the personal pleasure we get from certain kinds of fic - and I'm not just referring to sexual pleasure - and that perhaps we're uncomfortable "using" people for such a purpose? Along those same lines, is it perhaps bumping up against other issues with media and celebrity in the information age, and making us look at the lines we draw for ourselves more closely than we'd like to?

Despite the way some of this has ended up being phrased, I really don't have an agenda I'm pushing here - I genuinely feel the answer is "I don't know" and I'm curious what other people think about it.

Edited to add: OK, maybe I do have an agenda - but I'm trying not to, honest!

[identity profile] chatona.livejournal.com 2008-07-31 05:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm so unsquickable by RPS it's not even funny anymore. I mean. I read RPS and I write RPS and I ... well, I can see why people might consider it to be wrong (privacy of another person and all), but.

In my head, the persons become characters. Characters who share a name and looks with a person that actually lives, but characters nonetheless. Fictional character. And that makes all the difference.